On 5/7/2011 12:12 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
If this is used a lot, we should consider adding it. Is it?
Interesting. I've never seen that convention in regular publications.
As for using an STD citation, the STD is a single citation. The fact that it's
"purpose" is as an indirect pointer to a set of documents probably does not put
it in a class of its own: is true for /most/ citations. Most of what we cite
contain points to other references.
That an STD is 'pure' in the sense of having no content other than those
multiple citations does make it look interesting, but there are other such
documents that primarily serve to aggregate references.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
