> During an off-list conversation, there was a comment about going back to the > basics to side-step issues that the WG cannot solve. The questions that > came up are as follows: > > (i) What problems are the WG attempting to solve? > > (ii) Does it have the commitment to do the work? > > (iii) Can the work be completed within the defined period?
I think it's particularly important to do 4409, 5321, and 5322. We need to do 5321 and 5322 in order to finally obsolete 821 and 822, and I think 4409 needs to be at the same level as 5321. I'm ambivalent about spending the time to do the others -- I'm not sure how much they buy us. > We have a 1 hour block at IETF 81 Quebec City (Tuesday, July 26, 1710 -- > unfortunately opposite vcarddav) to discuss these topics. Right: I can't be in the YAM meeting because of the vCardDAV conflict. Sorry. I think I look at handling the other documents in the same sense that I look at the efforts to find all the RFC that might maybe possibly kinda-oughta be moved to Historic, and spinning around on them: there are better things to do with our time. Barry _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
