Hi John, Randy,
I posted a rough summary of the WGLC at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00636.html Could
you please submit a revision of draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-00 that
takes into account the comments received during the WGLC?
I recommend avoiding any document changes that might even
accidentally introduce protocol changes, destabilize the protocol, or
introduce semantic or syntactic changes.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG co-chair
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam