Hi John, Randy,

I posted a rough summary of the WGLC at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00636.html Could you please submit a revision of draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-00 that takes into account the comments received during the WGLC?

I recommend avoiding any document changes that might even accidentally introduce protocol changes, destabilize the protocol, or introduce semantic or syntactic changes.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG co-chair

_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam

Reply via email to