Hi John,
At 02:07 PM 7/20/2011, John C Klensin wrote:
Ok. From the above and as far as I know, the only two changes
needed for -01 are:
* The text about "aliases" discussed earlier. The real
issue is exactly what RFC 5321 prohibits when it
prohibits the use of aliases. IMO, that problem needs
to be addressed there, not in 4409bis. But, modulo that
concern, the text is, IMO, now clear about what
Submission servers are expected/ permitted to do.
* A few small typographical errors, mostly resulting
from the 4409-> 4409bis conversion, that were not caught
earlier.
Unless you identify something else, I will get -01 posted as
soon after the posting window reopens Monday as I can manage. I
believe the specification is then ready for IETF Last Call.
I am okay with the above. If WG participants do not have any
concerns about the above changes and -01, an IETF Last Call will be requested.
Even if some of the changes proposed have not made it into the draft,
it does not mean that they do not have any merit.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG co-chair
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
