Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the review.
At 04:04 19-08-2011, Stephen Farrell wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Given that start-tls is (as stated) the most common
way to secure the submission channel, perhaps the
mention of IPsec in 3.3 would be better replaced
with a reference to start-tls?
I posted a message to the YAM WG about this. There wasn't any
response. I am going to default to a "no change" as this was not
raised as an issue during the WGLC or the Last Call.
Please do not read it as meaning that your comment does not have
merit. As the intended status of the draft is Full Standard and the
text was already in RFC 4409, the barrier for making a change is higher.
typo in IANA cnosiderations? "The table in Table 1..."
s/table/text/?
I am waiting for feedback from the editors about fixes to the IANA
Considerations section.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
