Hi Pete,
At 12:01 24-08-2011, Pete Resnick wrote:
Were other comments getting fixed and therefore a new draft will be
produced (today preferably) that will address this DISCUSS, or is
this the only thing and I should put in an RFC Editor note?
The other comments have been resolved. It's may be too late to ask
for a new draft to be produced.
There were concerns within the working group about taking the easy
path which was to drop the text. There has been further discussions
about the replacement text since my latest reply to Russ. I would
like to discuss the issue with my co-chair. My recommendation is to
remove draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02 from tomorrow's IESG agenda.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG co-chair
P.S. The easier path was actually different from what some WG
participants may have perceived.
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
