Hi Chris,
Thanks for taking the time to review the document.
At 15:20 24-08-2011, Chris Newman wrote:
Informative reference to RFC 5068 / BCP 134:
I think an informative reference would be helpful to readers, but if
adding that reference would cause an approval delay then expedience
is more important.
There was a comment about having such a reference (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00744.html ).
SMTP AUTH / STARTTLS:
I have seen SMTP AUTH and STARTTLS work well operationally between
multiple independent implementations of submission. Problems with
those technologies related to MTA relay are unrelated to this
submission draft and thus need no additional text in this draft.
The input may be useful to the authors of the relevant specifications.
This is the last Last Call comment. I'll consider all Last Call
comments as having been addressed.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
