Greg McCarroll writes: > 1250 of which went to nat torkington on a sponsorship gig, ... or didn't, as the case may be :-) It sounds to me like their objections were quite reasonable. They just weren't expecting to have to flex with the chaos as much as turned out necessary. Fair enough. I hope 2001's YAPC learns from this and can avoid tripping up on sponsors expectations. What has this done for the $$$ situation? Do you need more bucks to break even? Nat
- III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !!! Greg McCarroll
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !... Chris Heathcote
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !... Redvers Davies
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !... DJ Adams
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EURO... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !... Leon Brocard
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EURO... Greg McCarroll
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::... David Hodgkinson
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YA... Redvers Davies
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::... Nathan Torkington
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YA... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !... Leon Brocard
- Re: Sponsorship != Advertising (was Re: III PULLO... Richard Foley
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !... David LANDGREN
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EUROPE !... Philip Newton
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EURO... Greg McCarroll
- Re: III PULLOUT OF SPONSORSHIP FOR YAPC::EURO... Marty Pauley
