ping Alejandro (phone typing)
On May 20, 2013, at 11:04, Alejandro Abdelnur <[email protected]> wrote: > [I know it has been discussed before the need (or not) of having the current > wrappers hiding the protobuf generated classes]. > > I order to do things like AMs failover and checkpointing I need to serialize > app IDs, app attempt IDs, containers and/or IDs, resource requests, etc. > > This means that the current wrapping hides the PB impl, thus hiding the > provided ser/deser capabilities. > > I could force-cast a record to ProtoBase (which is private) and then get the > PROTO Message and then do the ser/deser with that. > > But this, IMO, is a no no. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks > > -- > Alejandro
