Will do

FWIW: at least two people reported errors on that ticket once the patch had 
been applied, so I'm not convinced it is correct.


On Jun 16, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> wrote:

> HDFS-4866 was committed a couple of days ago - hence isn't showing up in my 
> filters.
> 
> Can you please file a new jira for the linker issues?
> 
> thanks,
> Arun
> 
> On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> 
>> HDFS-4866 is marked as a blocker. A patch was submitted and applied, but it 
>> only fixes compilation. As I marked on the ticket, the results remain 
>> unusable due to linker issues.
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 16, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Which one are you talking about Ralph? This doesn't show up on any blocker 
>>> list.
>>> 
>>> http://s.apache.org/hadoop-blocker-bugs
>>> 
>>> Arun
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 15, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Not trying to be a pain, but I am trying to get clarification. The 
>>>> protocol buffer support is still broken. Do you intend to release 2.1 with 
>>>> that unfixed?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 15, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Karthik Kambatla <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Re-posting here to the wider audience:
>>>>> 
>>>>> HADOOP-9517 (Document Hadoop Compatibility): I believe I have incorporated
>>>>> all suggestions so far. It would be great if people could take another 
>>>>> look
>>>>> at it. I ll iterate fast on any comments so we get this in by the time 
>>>>> rest
>>>>> of the code pieces are committed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Karthik
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Ralph Castain <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just curious of your procedures. Given that there is at least one blocker
>>>>>> JIRA out there that has yet to be fully resolved, do you intend to 
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> anyway?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If the intention is to get the release out in time for the Hadoop Summit
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> have a very tight schedule.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Because the release vote runs for 7 days, we should have an RC latest
>>>>>>> Monday afternoon, and we should encourage folks to verify & vote ASAP, 
>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>> if we need to cut a new RC we can do it on Tuesday. Another thing to
>>>>>>> consider is that if the changes on an RC are corrections that do not
>>>>>> affect
>>>>>>> code, we could agree on not reseting the voting period clock if we need
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> cut a new RC (ie doc, build, notes changes).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Of the JIRAs in my laundry list for 2.1 the ones I would really want in
>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> YARN-752, MAPREDUCE-5171 & YARN-787.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The first 2 are already +1ed, the last one needs to be reviewed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have not committed the first 2 ones yet because I don't want to 
>>>>>>> disrupt
>>>>>>> things for the folks doing QA.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Arun, as you are coordinating the work for this release, please do 
>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>> them or give me the go ahead and I'll commit.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also, it  would be great if you can review YARN-787 (as per discussions,
>>>>>>> the changes on the milli-slot calculations do not affect the current
>>>>>>> calculations, that would be left for MAPREDUCE-5311 to do).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'll be checking my email over the weekend and I can take care of some
>>>>>>> stuff if needed (while the monkeys sleep).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thx
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[email protected]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Following is a revisited assessment of JIRAs I would like to get in the
>>>>>>>> 2.1 release:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From the 1st group I think all 3 should make.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From the 2nd group I think YARN-791 should make it for sure and ideally
>>>>>>>> MAPREDUCE-5130.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From the 3rd group, I don't think this JIRA will make it.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From the 4th group, we don't need to worry about this or 2.1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> JIRAs that are in shape to make it to 2.1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * YARN-752: In AMRMClient, automatically add corresponding rack 
>>>>>>>> requests
>>>>>>>> for requested nodes
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: behavior change
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: patch avail, +1ed.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * MAPREDUCE-5171: Expose blacklisted nodes from the MR AM REST API
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: Addition to MRAM HTTP API
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: patch avail, +1ed, needs to be committed
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * YARN-787: Remove resource min from Yarn client API
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: Yarn client API change
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: patch avail, needs to be reviewed. (the calculation of
>>>>>> slot-millis
>>>>>>>> is not affected, the MIN is taken from conf for now)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> JIRAs that require minor work to make it to 2.1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * YARN-521: Augment AM - RM client module to be able to request
>>>>>> containers
>>>>>>>> only at specific locations
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: AMRM client API change
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: patch not avail yet (requires YARN-752)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * YARN-791: Ensure that RM RPC APIs that return nodes are consistent
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> /nodes REST API
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: Yarn client API & proto change
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: patch avail, review in progress
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * MAPREDUCE-5130: Add missing job config options to mapred-default.xml
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: behavior change
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: patch avail but some tests are failing
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> JIRAs that require significant work to make it to 2.1 and may not make
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * YARN-649: Make container logs available over HTTP in plain text
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: Addition to NM HTTP REST API. Needed for MAPREDUCE-4362 (which
>>>>>>>> does not change API)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: patch avail, review in progress
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> JIRAs that don't need to make it to 2.1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> * MAPREDUCE-5311: Remove slot millis computation logic and deprecate
>>>>>>>> counter constants
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> impact: behavior change
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> status: per discussion we should first add memory-millis and
>>>>>> vcores-millis
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On the Bigtop side of things, once we have stable Bigtop 0.6.0
>>>>>> platform
>>>>>>>>>>> based on Hadoop 2.0.x codeline we plan to start running the same
>>>>>>>>> battery
>>>>>>>>>>> of integration tests on the branch-2.1-beta.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> We plan to simply file JIRAs if anything gets detected and I will
>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>> publish the URL of the Jenkins job once it gets created.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Roman. Is there an ETA for this? Also, please file jiras with
>>>>>>>>> Blocker priority to catch attention.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The build is up and running (and all green on all of the 9 Linux
>>>>>>>>> platforms!):
>>>>>>>>> http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/job/Hadoop-2.1.0/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The immediate benefit here is that we get to see that the
>>>>>>>>> build is ok on all these Linuxes and all anybody can easily
>>>>>>>>> install packaged Hadoop 2.1.0 nightly builds.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Starting from next week, I'll start running regular tests
>>>>>>>>> on these bits and will keep you guys posted!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Roman.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Arun C. Murthy
>>> Hortonworks Inc.
>>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
> 
> 

Reply via email to