Hi Vinod , can you file an JIRA for this topic to discuss, if passed, then you assign to yourself if you interested,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We used to have schedulers as separate modules and thus separate artifacts > in Hadoop-1. This had many benefits, I am thinking we should do the same now > - Separate artifacts: Fast fixes of scheduler-only changes are easy to > test. Just swap the scheduler jar. One could argue that we can swap the > resourcemanager jar similarly. > - Separate source tree: We can focus more on the stability of > RM<->Scheduler APIs and interaction. Right now with all the > scheduler-specific functionality flowing in, in multiple JIRAs, it is > getting difficult to separate out the core changes from the scheduler > specific changes. > > It isn't a major change from what we have today, but a major source-move. > So thought I'll garner opinions. > > Thoughts? > > +Vinod > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
