Hi Robert, Thank you for creating JIRA. Let's discuss it on the JIRA not to split information between JIRA and mailing list.
Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > cool. I've filed a JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3086 > > If you want to maintain the current value of 4GB as the default value, I > probably need to introduce a new configuration value, similar to: > > public static final String YARN_MINICLUSTER_CONTROL_RESOURCE_MONITORING = > YARN_PREFIX + "minicluster.control-resource-monitoring"; > > Or is there another approach you would prefer? > > I'll add a patch to the JIRA once I've found time to fix it. > > > Regards, > > Robert > > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Robert, >> >> No, there is no limitation about this. We can make the configuration >> configurable. I think we should make the default value 4GB for >> backward compatibility. Could you create a JIRA for tracking the >> issue? >> >> Thanks, >> - Tsuyoshi >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > It seems that the memory per NodeManager is hardcoded in the >> > MiniYARNCluster. I would like to pass a custom value to the >> MiniYARNCluster. >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/MiniYARNCluster.java#L512 >> > >> > Is there a reason for this limitation? >> > Would you accept a patch which makes this value configurable? >> > >> > >> > Best, >> > Robert >>
