By the way, for the purposes of merge vote, I believe a committer's vote is
binding. So, Wangda and Zhihai's votes should be binding. :)

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Zhihai Xu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> thanks
> Zhihai Xu
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Xuan Gong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 Binding
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Xuan Gong
> >
> > > On Sep 22, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Junping Du <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1. (Binding).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Junping
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Wangda Tan <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 3:19 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge YARN-1197 container resize into trunk
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding),
> > >
> > > Thanks Jian starting this thread. This can minimize effort of works
> > across branches.
> > >
> > > To clarify, this feature is end-to-end code  completed, we have API,
> > rm/nm implementations patches committed, but we haven't tested it
> > end-to-end. Filed YARN-4175 to create an example program to test it
> > end-to-end.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Wangda
> > >
> > >> On Sep 16, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Jian He <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Meng Ding and Wangda Tan for all the hard work !
> > >>
> > >> I would like to call a vote to merge YARN-1197 container resize into
> > trunk.
> > >>
> > >> Key idea:
> > >> This feature adds the ability for AM to change container resource size
> > at runtime.
> > >>
> > >> Details:
> > >> - This feature is tracked at
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1197
> > >> - It’s currently developed at a separate branch:
> > https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commits/YARN-1197
> > >> - A uber patch(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4157)
> > generated from YARN-1197 to run against trunk  shows all unit tests have
> > passed.
> > >> - This feature now can work end-to-end.
> > >> -  All the unresolved jiras under YARN-1197 will be the next step.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Wangda Tan & Meng Ding & Jian He
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to