[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573234#comment-13573234
]
Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-387:
---------------------------------
+1 to the proposal
If I understand the RMAdminProtocol correctly, RPCs are sent to the RM? Would
it make sense to call it the AdminRMProtocol to reflect this in line with the
ordering in the other protocols?
I think it would also be helpful to add/go over the comments for the java
protocol classes, as that is the first place many developers will go when
trying to understand how YARN works and how to program against it. Not sure if
that's in the scope of this JIRA or not?
> Fix inconsistent protocol naming
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-387
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Assignee: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Labels: incompatible
>
> We now have different and inconsistent naming schemes for various protocols.
> It was hard to explain to users, mainly in direct interactions at
> talks/presentations and user group meetings, with such naming.
> We should fix these before we go beta.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
