[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13684881#comment-13684881
 ] 

Hitesh Shah commented on YARN-387:
----------------------------------

@Vinod, maybe ContainerManagementProtocol and RMAdministrationProtocol to 
clarify things a bit more? I am fine with the naming mentioned in the previous 
comment too. 
                
> Fix inconsistent protocol naming
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-387
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-387
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: incompatible
>         Attachments: YARN-387-20130616.txt
>
>
> We now have different and inconsistent naming schemes for various protocols. 
> It was hard to explain to users, mainly in direct interactions at 
> talks/presentations and user group meetings, with such naming.
> We should fix these before we go beta. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to