[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15666590#comment-15666590
]
Varun Saxena commented on YARN-5287:
------------------------------------
[~brahmareddy] IIUC, we now use individual JIRAs' to build release notes.
YARN-5765 is already there which can be used to track the revert. Which is
similar to what has been done for YARN-5882 (which will be used to track revert
of YARN-4126).
While reverting YARN-5287, YARN-5765 has been mentioned in the commit message.
The only thing which needs to be done is close that JIRA and mark fix version
as 3.0.0-alpha2. Shouldn't that be enough ? Thoughts ?
> LinuxContainerExecutor fails to set proper permission
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5287
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5287
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: nodemanager
> Affects Versions: 2.7.2
> Reporter: Ying Zhang
> Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.8.0, 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: YARN-5287-tmp.patch, YARN-5287.003.patch,
> YARN-5287.004.patch, YARN-5287.005.patch, YARN-5287.branch-2.001.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> LinuxContainerExecutor fails to set the proper permissions on the local
> directories(i.e., /hadoop/yarn/local/usercache/... by default) if the cluster
> has been configured with a restrictive umask, e.g.: umask 077. Job failed due
> to the following reason:
> Path /hadoop/yarn/local/usercache/ambari-qa/appcache/application_xxxxxxxx has
> permission 700 but needs permission 750
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
