[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15869435#comment-15869435
]
Sunil G commented on YARN-6164:
-------------------------------
[~bibinchundatt], I am still doubtful about that approach. Since many
informations related to configuration is already exposed by QueueInfo,
*Properties* may not a become a better logical grouping unless we move all
existing config items to new subclass. This will cause compatibility, and we
wont be able to do that. For me, I feel we many confuse more if we add
*Properties* sub section , as its not a single grouping for configuration
related items.
> Expose maximum-am-resource-percent in YarnClient
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-6164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6164
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.7.2
> Reporter: Benson Qiu
> Assignee: Benson Qiu
> Attachments: YARN-6164.001.patch, YARN-6164.002.patch,
> YARN-6164.003.patch
>
>
> `yarn.scheduler.capacity.maximum-am-resource-percent` is exposed through the
> [Cluster Scheduler
> API|http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/ResourceManagerRest.html#Cluster_Scheduler_API],
> but not through
> [YarnClient|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/YarnClient.html].
> Since YarnClient and RM REST APIs depend on different ports (8032 vs 8088 by
> default), it would be nice to expose `maximum-am-resource-percent` in
> YarnClient as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
