[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15878818#comment-15878818
 ] 

Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-6210:
----------------------------------------

Looks good.  A couple tiny nits:

* {{FSAppAttempt.isStarved(Resource usage, Resource share)}}: probably a bad 
name.  It doesn't have anything to do with starving.  It's a comparator.
* {quote}The reservation-at-lower-priority assert is retained.{quote}  Nope, 
the assignment-at-lower-priority assert is retained.  The original test also 
had an assert to test the reservation itself: {code} // Reserved container 
should still be at lower priority          
    for (RMContainer container : app.getReservedContainers()) {         
      assertEquals(2,           
          container.getReservedSchedulerKey().getPriority().getPriority());     
        
    }{code}
* On the assert messages, please keep in mind what the person triaging the 
failures will see, e.g. "Basic allocation failed expected:<1> but was:<0>."  
The message doesn't explain the numbers.  Not a major issue, and not something 
I expect you to fix, but I wanted to point it out.

> FS: Node reservations can interfere with preemption
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6210
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6210
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fairscheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.0
>            Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: YARN-6210.1.patch, YARN-6210.2.patch, YARN-6210.3.patch
>
>
> Today, on a saturated cluster, apps with pending demand reserve nodes. A new 
> app might not be able to preempt resources because these nodes are already 
> reserved. This can be reproduced by the example in YARN-6151. 
> Since node reservations are to prevent starvation of apps requesting large 
> containers, triggering these reservations only on starved applications would 
> avoid this situation. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to