[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15939419#comment-15939419
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on YARN-5829:
--------------------------------------
Github user szegedim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/201#discussion_r107806509
--- Diff:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fair/FSSchedulerNode.java
---
@@ -18,35 +18,66 @@
package org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair;
+import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
import org.apache.hadoop.classification.InterfaceAudience.Private;
import org.apache.hadoop.classification.InterfaceStability.Unstable;
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.api.records.ApplicationAttemptId;
+import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.api.records.ContainerId;
+import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.api.records.Resource;
import
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.rmcontainer.RMContainer;
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.rmnode.RMNode;
import
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.SchedulerApplicationAttempt;
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.scheduler.SchedulerRequestKey;
import
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.SchedulerNode;
+import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.util.resource.Resources;
-import java.util.Collection;
-import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.*;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentSkipListSet;
@Private
@Unstable
public class FSSchedulerNode extends SchedulerNode {
private static final Log LOG = LogFactory.getLog(FSSchedulerNode.class);
+ private static final Comparator<RMContainer> comparator =
+ new Comparator<RMContainer>() {
+ @Override
+ public int compare(RMContainer o1, RMContainer o2) {
+ return Long.compare(o1.getContainerId().getContainerId(),
+ o2.getContainerId().getContainerId());
+ }
+ };
private FSAppAttempt reservedAppSchedulable;
- private final Set<RMContainer> containersForPreemption =
- new ConcurrentSkipListSet<>();
+ // Stores preemption list until the container is completed
+ @VisibleForTesting
+ final Set<RMContainer> containersForPreemption =
+ new ConcurrentSkipListSet<>(comparator);
+ // Stores preemption list after the container is completed before
assigned
+ @VisibleForTesting
+ final Map<FSAppAttempt, Resource>
+ resourcesPreemptedPerApp = new LinkedHashMap<>();
+ Resource totalResourcesPreempted = Resource.newInstance(0, 0);
--- End diff --
All right.
> FS preemption should reserve a node before considering containers on it for
> preemption
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5829
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5829
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: fairscheduler
> Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
> Assignee: Miklos Szegedi
>
> FS preemption evaluates nodes for preemption, and subsequently preempts
> identified containers. If this node is not reserved for a specific
> application, any other application could be allocated resources on this node.
> Reserving the node for the starved application before preempting containers
> would help avoid this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
