[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16085243#comment-16085243
]
Rohith Sharma K S commented on YARN-6733:
-----------------------------------------
bq. cluster ! sub app user ! queryA ! DAG ! 1234 ! queryA_1450024426 Hence the
sub app name and entity id. What do you think?
The purpose why I was asking to drop is , Firstly, how does subAppName is
passed to collector? Secondly, If queries are standard defined then I agree we
do need subAppName like TPCH queries. But for adhoc queries, adding whole query
into row key does not looks good because adhoc query can be in any length. I
think we should NOT add subAppName into row key.
> Add table for storing sub-application entities
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-6733
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6733
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
> Reporter: Vrushali C
> Assignee: Vrushali C
> Attachments: IMG_7040.JPG, YARN-6733-YARN-5355.001.patch
>
>
> After a discussion with Tez folks, we have been thinking over introducing a
> table to store sub-application information.
> For example, if a Tez session runs for a certain period as User X and runs a
> few AMs. These AMs accept DAGs from other users. Tez will execute these dags
> with a doAs user. ATSv2 should store this information in a new table perhaps
> called as "sub_application" table.
> This jira tracks the code changes needed for table schema creation.
> I will file other jiras for writing to that table, updating the user name
> fields to include sub-application user etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
