[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13721403#comment-13721403
 ] 

Alejandro Abdelnur commented on YARN-937:
-----------------------------------------


{{getRMCurrentAddress()}}, we would have to pass the config and a more 
appropriate name would be {{getRMSchedulerAddress()}}.

Also, shouldn't be the {{ApplicationClientProtocol}} instance the one returning 
the address?

And this seems like it will affect other things as well. I think we should take 
care of this in another JIRA.

Are you OK on committing the current patch and following up with another JIRA 
(making it a blocker for the release after 2.1.0)?


                
> Fix unmanaged AM in non-secure/secure setup post YARN-701
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-937
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-937
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta
>            Reporter: Arun C Murthy
>            Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.1.0-beta
>
>         Attachments: YARN-937.patch, YARN-937.patch, YARN-937.patch, 
> YARN-937.patch, YARN-937.patch, YARN-937.patch
>
>
> Fix unmanaged AM in non-secure/secure setup post YARN-701 since app-tokens 
> will be used in both scenarios.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to