[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16130211#comment-16130211
]
Sunil G commented on YARN-6610:
-------------------------------
Latest changes looks fine. Fixing checkstyle comment and renaming
{{calculateShares2}} to {{calculateSharesForMandatoryResources}}
> DominantResourceCalculator.getResourceAsValue() dominant param is no longer
> appropriate
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-6610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6610
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: resourcemanager
> Affects Versions: YARN-3926
> Reporter: Daniel Templeton
> Assignee: Daniel Templeton
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: YARN-6610.001.patch, YARN-6610.YARN-3926.002.patch,
> YARN-6610.YARN-3926.003.patch, YARN-6610.YARN-3926.004.patch,
> YARN-6610.YARN-3926.005.patch, YARN-6610.YARN-3926.006.patch,
> YARN-6610.YARN-3926.006-rebased.patch, YARN-6610.YARN-3926.perf.patch,
> YARN-6610.YARN-3926.perf-rebased.patch,
> YARN-6610.YARN-3926.perf-wangda-001.patch,
> YARN-6610.YARN-3926.perf-wangda-002.patch
>
>
> The {{dominant}} param assumes there are only two resources, i.e. true means
> to compare the dominant, and false means to compare the subordinate. Now
> that there are _n_ resources, this parameter no longer makes sense.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
