[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16176401#comment-16176401
 ] 

Sunil G commented on YARN-7237:
-------------------------------

Thanks [~leftnoteasy] for the idea. I also think this is better

Some high level thoughts on this context
# In some cases, minimum and maximum could be set to some infinity values. In 
that case, we might need to bound this to a some reasonable upper values 
instead of INT_MAX or LONG_MAX (in case of new resources). Because below config 
is valid and it does not have any min or max
{noformat}
 <property>
   <name>yarn.resource-types</name>
   <value>resource1</value>
 </property>

 <property>
   <name>yarn.resource-types.resource1.units</name>
   <value>G</value>
 </property>
{noformat}
# Override  behavior makes sense to me as well. Could we document it also well 
enough that we will have clear clarity on same for users/admins as well.

I am still reviewing code and will share comments if any soon.

> Cleanup usages of ResourceProfiles
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-7237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7237
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: YARN-7237.001.patch, YARN-7237.002.patch, 
> YARN-7237.003.patch
>
>
> While doing tests, there're a couple of issues:
> 1) When use {{ProfileCapability#getProfileCapabilityOverride}}, it does 
> overwrite of whatever specified in resource-profiles.json when value >= 0. 
> Which is different from javadocs of {{ProfileCapability}} 
> bq. For example, if you have a resource profile "small" that maps to <4096M, 
> 2 cores, 1 gpu> and you set the capability override to <8192M, 0 cores, 0 
> gpu>, then the actual resource allocation on the ResourceManager will be 
> <8192M, 2 cores, 1 gpu>
> To me, the correct behavior should do overwrite when value > 0. The reason 
> is, by default resource value will be set to 0, For example, assume we have a 
> profile {{"a" = (mem=3, vcore=5, res_1=7)}}, and create a 
> capability-overwrite (capability = new resource(8). The final result should 
> be (mem=8, vcore=5, res_1=7), instead of (mem=8, vcore=0, res_1=0).
> 2) ResourceProfileManager now loads minimum/maximum profile from config file 
> (resource-profiles.json), to me this is not correct because minimum/maximum 
> allocation for each resource types are already specified inside 
> {{resource-types.xml}}. We should always use 
> {{ResourceUtils#getResourceTypesMinimum/MaximumAllocation}} to get from 
> resource-types.xml and yarn-site.xml. This value will be added to profiles so 
> client can get these configs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to