[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16206347#comment-16206347
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7307:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~sunilg] for updating the patch, 

Few comments:

1) Could we add a new static method to ResourceUtils to initialize from 
ResourceTypeInfo directly, and move logics below to the method:
{code}
        225         List<ResourceTypeInfo> resourceTypes = 
getResourceTypeInfo();
226         Map<String, ResourceInformation> resourceInformationMap = new 
HashMap<>();
227     
228         for (ResourceTypeInfo resourceType : resourceTypes) {
229           resourceInformationMap.put(resourceType.getName(),
230               ResourceInformation.newInstance(resourceType.getName(),
231                   resourceType.getDefaultUnit(), 
resourceType.getResourceType()));
232         }
{code}

2) This patch updated YarnClientImpl service start to set resource types 
directly. I'm not sure if we should move this to a separate method so client 
can opt-out initialize resource types. I can see the biggest advantage of your 
approach is client can get resource types updated without changing any code if 
YarnClient initialized and started before any resource object created. However 
since applications need to update their code in order to use this feature 
anyway, I'm not sure if it is the best option to add this call inside 
serviceStart. 

Another (safer) option is to add a boolean flag to getResourceTypeInfo to 
indicate that if client want to update ResourceUtils with the method call or 
not. 

The same comment applies to AM.

3) Do you want to add changes to AMRMClient for now or move it to a separate 
ticket?

> Revisit resource-types.xml loading behaviors
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-7307
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7307
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Sunil G
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: YARN-7307.001.patch, YARN-7307.002.patch
>
>
> Existing feature requires every client has a resource-types.xml in order to 
> use multiple resource types, should we allow client/AM update supported 
> resource types via Yarn APIs?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to