[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13736067#comment-13736067
]
Carlo Curino commented on YARN-624:
-----------------------------------
I do refer to that. The argument is that provided the planned capacity is
tightly guaranteed to be available, AM-side hoarding of container is sufficient
to achieve gang scheduling.
Again bar a few limitations that I mentioned (and maybe others I missed) this
will get us close to get at least basic deadlock-free, gang-scheduling
semantics (as we discussed in person with no real promises on location).
> Support gang scheduling in the AM RM protocol
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-624
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-624
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: api, scheduler
> Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha
> Reporter: Sandy Ryza
> Assignee: Sandy Ryza
>
> Per discussion on YARN-392 and elsewhere, gang scheduling, in which a
> scheduler runs a set of tasks when they can all be run at the same time,
> would be a useful feature for YARN schedulers to support.
> Currently, AMs can approximate this by holding on to containers until they
> get all the ones they need. However, this lends itself to deadlocks when
> different AMs are waiting on the same containers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
