[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16254103#comment-16254103
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on YARN-6483:
--------------------------------------
Github user xslogic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/289#discussion_r151241885
--- Diff:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/records/NodeReport.java
---
@@ -53,15 +53,15 @@ public static NodeReport newInstance(NodeId nodeId,
NodeState nodeState,
String httpAddress, String rackName, Resource used, Resource
capability,
int numContainers, String healthReport, long lastHealthReportTime) {
return newInstance(nodeId, nodeState, httpAddress, rackName, used,
- capability, numContainers, healthReport, lastHealthReportTime,
null);
+ capability, numContainers, healthReport, lastHealthReportTime,
null, null);
}
@Private
@Unstable
public static NodeReport newInstance(NodeId nodeId, NodeState nodeState,
String httpAddress, String rackName, Resource used, Resource
capability,
int numContainers, String healthReport, long lastHealthReportTime,
- Set<String> nodeLabels) {
+ Set<String> nodeLabels, Integer decommissioningTimeout) {
--- End diff --
Can we use int ? Am not confortable using Integer - given the sometimes
arbitrary boxing/unboxing rules.
> Add nodes transitioning to DECOMMISSIONING state to the list of updated nodes
> returned by the Resource Manager as a response to the Application Master
> heartbeat
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-6483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6483
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: resourcemanager
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0
> Reporter: Juan RodrĂguez Hortalá
> Attachments: YARN-6483-v1.patch
>
>
> The DECOMMISSIONING node state is currently used as part of the graceful
> decommissioning mechanism to give time for tasks to complete in a node that
> is scheduled for decommission, and for reducer tasks to read the shuffle
> blocks in that node. Also, YARN effectively blacklists nodes in
> DECOMMISSIONING state by assigning them a capacity of 0, to prevent
> additional containers to be launched in those nodes, so no more shuffle
> blocks are written to the node. This blacklisting is not effective for
> applications like Spark, because a Spark executor running in a YARN container
> will keep receiving more tasks after the corresponding node has been
> blacklisted at the YARN level. We would like to propose a modification of the
> YARN heartbeat mechanism so nodes transitioning to DECOMMISSIONING are added
> to the list of updated nodes returned by the Resource Manager as a response
> to the Application Master heartbeat. This way a Spark application master
> would be able to blacklist a DECOMMISSIONING at the Spark level.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
