[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13744029#comment-13744029
 ] 

Steve Loughran commented on YARN-896:
-------------------------------------

Chris -I use the bar today as measure of expected nodes vs actual; i.e. what 
percentage of the goal of work has been met -which is free to vary up and down 
w/node failures -the percent bar is free to go in both directions

YARN-1039 already says "add a flag to say long-lived", so that future versions 
of YARN can behave differently. This could do more than GUI -in particular 
YARN-3 cgroup limits would be something you may want to turn on for services, 
to exactly limit their RAM & CPU to what they asked for. If a long-lived 
service underestimates its requirements the impact on the node is worse than if 
a short-lived container does it -for that you may want to be more forgiving.
                
> Roll up for long lived YARN
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-896
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>
> YARN is intended to be general purpose, but it is missing some features to be 
> able to truly support long lived applications and long lived containers.
> This ticket is intended to
>  # discuss what is needed to support long lived processes
>  # track the resulting JIRA.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to