[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eric Payne updated YARN-7619:
-----------------------------
    Attachment: YARN-7619.004.branch-3.0.patch

{{TestNodeLabelContainerAllocation}} is also failing in trunk and is not 
related to this patch.

Attaching branch-3.0 patch.

> Max AM Resource value in CS UI is different for every user
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-7619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7619
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: capacity scheduler, yarn
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1, 2.8.2, 3.1.0
>            Reporter: Eric Payne
>            Assignee: Eric Payne
>         Attachments: Max AM Resources is Different for Each User.png, 
> YARN-7619.001.patch, YARN-7619.002.patch, YARN-7619.003.patch, 
> YARN-7619.004.branch-3.0.patch, YARN-7619.004.patch
>
>
> YARN-7245 addressed the problem that the {{Max AM Resource}} in the capacity 
> scheduler UI used to contain the queue-level AM limit instead of the 
> user-level AM limit. It fixed this by using the user-specific AM limit that 
> is calculated in {{LeafQueue#activateApplications}}, stored in each user's 
> {{LeafQueue#User}} object, and retrieved via 
> {{UserInfo#getResourceUsageInfo}}.
> The problem is that this user-specific AM limit depends on the activity of 
> other users and other applications in a queue, and it is only calculated and 
> updated when a user's application is activated. So, when 
> {{CapacitySchedulerPage}} retrieves the user-specific AM limit, it is a stale 
> value unless an application was recently activated for a particular user.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to