[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16333792#comment-16333792
]
Arun Suresh commented on YARN-7763:
-----------------------------------
I am ok with this in the short term - but as [~kkaranasos] mentioned, we need
to decide how we merge the constraints.
> Allow Constraints specified in the SchedulingRequest to override application
> level constraints
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-7763
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7763
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Wangda Tan
> Assignee: Weiwei Yang
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: YARN-7763-YARN-6592.001.patch,
> YARN-7763-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-7763-YARN-6592.003.patch,
> YARN-7763-YARN-6592.004.patch, YARN-7763-YARN-6592.005.patch,
> YARN-7763-YARN-6592.006.patch
>
>
> As I mentioned on YARN-6599, we will add SchedulingRequest as part of the
> PlacementConstraintUtil method and both of processor/scheduler implementation
> will use the same logic. The logic looks like:
> {code:java}
> PlacementConstraint pc = schedulingRequest.getPlacementConstraint();
> If (pc == null) {
> pc =
> PlacementConstraintMgr.getPlacementConstraint(schedulingRequest.getAllocationTags());
> }
> // Do placement constraint match ...{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
