[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16346394#comment-16346394 ]
genericqa commented on YARN-7859: --------------------------------- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 4s{color} | {color:red} YARN-7859 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | JIRA Issue | YARN-7859 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12908482/YARN-7859-v1.patch | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/19542/console | | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org | This message was automatically generated. > New feature: add queue scheduling deadLine in fairScheduler. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: YARN-7859 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7859 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fairscheduler > Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2 > Environment: The environment of my company is > hadoop2.6.0-cdh5.4.7 > Reporter: wangwj > Priority: Major > Labels: fairscheduler, features, patch > Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-alpha2 > > Attachments: YARN-7859-v1.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > As everyone knows.In FairScheduler the phenomenon of queue scheduling > starvation often occurs when the number of cluster jobs is large.The App in > one or more queue are pending.So I have thought a way to solve this > problem.Add queue scheduling deadLine in fairScheduler.When a queue is not > scheduled for FairScheduler within a specified time.We mandatory scheduler it! > Now the way of community solves queue scheduling to starvation is preempt > container.But this way may increases the failure rate of the job. > On the basis of the above, I propose this issue... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org