[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16347209#comment-16347209
 ] 

Eric Payne commented on YARN-4606:
----------------------------------

Thanks everyone for the thoughtful analysis.

I am still analyzing in more depth, but I have a couple of thoughts:
{quote}this is a (known) potential issue of fair ordering policy.
{quote}
This can happen for fifo ordering policy as well.
{quote}have {{activeUsersOfPendingApps}} along with {{activeUsers}}. Hence in 
case of scheduling we can depend only on {{activeUse}}
{quote}
We need to be careful with these counts because a user can have both active and 
pending apps. I think the definitions should be:
 - {{activeUsers}}: users that have at least one active app
 - {{activeUsersOfPendingApps}}: users that have only pending apps.

> CapacityScheduler: applications could get starved because computation of 
> #activeUsers considers pending apps 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4606
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: capacity scheduler, capacityscheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Karam Singh
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: YARN-4606.1.poc.patch
>
>
> Currently, if all applications belong to same user in LeafQueue are pending 
> (caused by max-am-percent, etc.), ActiveUsersManager still considers the user 
> is an active user. This could lead to starvation of active applications, for 
> example:
> - App1(belongs to user1)/app2(belongs to user2) are active, app3(belongs to 
> user3)/app4(belongs to user4) are pending
> - ActiveUsersManager returns #active-users=4
> - However, there're only two users (user1/user2) are able to allocate new 
> resources. So computed user-limit-resource could be lower than expected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to