[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16355850#comment-16355850
]
Vrushali C commented on YARN-3895:
----------------------------------
Thanks [~jlowe] !
{quote}I am a bit confused about the application_id column for a domain table
entry. What if the domain doesn't apply to the entire application (i.e.: just
to one DAG within a multi-DAG app)
{quote}
Ah yes, good catch. The app id should be excluded from the domain table.
I had added it in thinking it would be easier to know which app ids / entities
would need to be updated in case of updates to a particular domain. But I
think we do not *absolutely need* the app ids there; we could do a table scan
to update the info in entities. I will think over a bit more about this case
when we have to update the domain info, but I think we can presently move ahead
along the lines of thought that updates to a domain is an infrequent occurrence
that does not require a super fast response time.
> Support ACLs in ATSv2
> ---------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3895
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3895
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
> Affects Versions: YARN-2928
> Reporter: Varun Saxena
> Assignee: Vrushali C
> Priority: Major
> Labels: YARN-5355
>
> This JIRA is to keep track of authorization support design discussions for
> both readers and collectors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
