[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16561665#comment-16561665
 ] 

Weiwei Yang commented on YARN-7494:
-----------------------------------

Hello [~sunilg]

Thanks for the updates, it looks almost good to me. Just few minor comments

CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.java
 * line 2144: this line can be removed
 * line 2212: can we rename "timeout" to something like "policySortingInterval"?

MultiNodeSortingManager
 * line 58: the logging, while starting RM, I got "Initializing 
MultiNodeSortingManager=MultiNodeSortingManager", this should be changed to 
"LOG.info("Initializing " + getName());", same as line 58

ResourceUsageBasedMultiNodeLookupPolicy - DefaultMultiNodeLookupPolicy
 * It seems this 2 policies are same, can we remove one for simplicity ?

MultiNodeSorter
 * line 72: can we print the sorting interval here too?

Thanks

> Add muti node lookup support for better placement
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-7494
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7494
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacity scheduler
>            Reporter: Sunil Govindan
>            Assignee: Sunil Govindan
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-7494.001.patch, YARN-7494.002.patch, 
> YARN-7494.003.patch, YARN-7494.004.patch, YARN-7494.005.patch, 
> YARN-7494.006.patch, YARN-7494.007.patch, YARN-7494.008.patch, 
> YARN-7494.009.patch, YARN-7494.010.patch, YARN-7494.11.patch, 
> YARN-7494.v0.patch, YARN-7494.v1.patch, multi-node-designProposal.png
>
>
> Instead of single node, for effectiveness we can consider a multi node lookup 
> based on partition to start with.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to