[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli updated YARN-899:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: YARN-899.12.patch
The patch looks good to me. The test is particularly impressive, great job!
I'm doing a source formatting of the new test and doing away with using
record-factories in the test. I'll commit this once Jenkins is okay.
One other thing I noticed is that queue-acls as they are in the patch don't
work well with hierarchical queues. In the interest of removing the regression
from 1.0, I'll push this and track queue hierarchy separately.
> Get queue administration ACLs working
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-899
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: scheduler
> Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta
> Reporter: Sandy Ryza
> Assignee: Xuan Gong
> Attachments: YARN-899.10.patch, YARN-899.10.patch, YARN-899.11.patch,
> YARN-899.12.patch, YARN-899.1.patch, YARN-899.2.patch, YARN-899.3.patch,
> YARN-899.4.patch, YARN-899.5.patch, YARN-899.5.patch, YARN-899.6.patch,
> YARN-899.7.patch, YARN-899.8.patch, YARN-899.9.patch
>
>
> The Capacity Scheduler documents the
> yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.<queue-path>.acl_administer_queue config option
> for controlling who can administer a queue, but it is not hooked up to
> anything. The Fair Scheduler could make use of a similar option as well.
> This is a feature-parity regression from MR1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
