[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16703500#comment-16703500
]
Botong Huang commented on YARN-9049:
------------------------------------
Understood. Let me ask this way: forget about implementation details, in
general, why would adding future app data entry in _ApplicationData_ be easier
than adding it directly in _ApplicationHomeSubCluster_?
I think at API/interface level, the latter makes more sense because
_ApplicationHomeSubCluster_ should already serve as _ApplicationData_ if not
renamed to it. If for mysql implementation, the former is easier (by adding a
extra layer), then this should be kept implementation specific, and not exposed
to the API?
> Add application submit data to state store
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-9049
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9049
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Bibin A Chundatt
> Assignee: Bibin A Chundatt
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9049.001.path
>
>
> As per the discussion in YARN-8898 we need to persist trimmend
> ApplicationSubmissionContext details to federation State Store.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
