[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16766813#comment-16766813
]
Wilfred Spiegelenburg commented on YARN-8967:
---------------------------------------------
After talking off line with a number of people the request was to divide this
change into two parts due to its size:
* _part 1_ for the new rules and changes to the existing PlacementRule code
* _part 2_ for the FS changes and integration
It is the only way that the change can be split and make them compile
separately. A new jira YARN-9298 is open for _part 1_ and we'll keep this jira
for _part 2_. Removing patch available until that one is checked in.
It will also allow work to start on enhancing the rules with filters etc which
have existing open jiras.
> Change FairScheduler to use PlacementRule interface
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-8967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8967
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: capacityscheduler, fairscheduler
> Reporter: Wilfred Spiegelenburg
> Assignee: Wilfred Spiegelenburg
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-8967.001.patch, YARN-8967.002.patch,
> YARN-8967.003.patch, YARN-8967.004.patch, YARN-8967.005.patch
>
>
> The PlacementRule interface was introduced to be used by all schedulers as
> per YARN-3635. The CapacityScheduler is using it but the FairScheduler is not
> and is using its own rule definition.
> YARN-8948 cleans up the implementation and removes the CS references which
> should allow this change to go through.
> This would be the first step in using one placement rule engine for both
> schedulers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
