[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16792091#comment-16792091
]
Eric Yang commented on YARN-8376:
---------------------------------
{quote}I don't see how to maintain full backwards compatibility if we continue
to use docker.trusted.registries, but in a different way. Are you ok with
this?{quote}
Yes, I am ok with this. The change only applies at the time that user adopt to
the new feature when there is a necessity to separate the two list by one pass
scan to separate the two lists. The remapping will require to add two configs
change and make one config inactive, requires more system admin labor to scan
the list twice or multiple times to determine which values go to which list.
> Separate white list for docker.trusted.registries and
> docker.privileged-container.registries
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-8376
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8376
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Eric Yang
> Assignee: Eric Yang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: docker
> Attachments: YARN-8376.001.patch, YARN-8376.002.patch
>
>
> In the ideal world, it would be possible to have separate white lists for
> docker registry depending on the security requirement for each type of docker
> images:
> 1. Registries from which we can run non-privileged containers without mounts
> 2. Registries from which we can run non-privileged containers with mounts
> 3. Registries from which we can run privileged or non-privileged containers
> with mounts
> In the current implementation, there are only type 1 and type 2 or 3. It
> would be nice to definite a separate white list to differentiate between 2
> and 3.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
