Tao Yang created YARN-9598:
------------------------------

             Summary: Make reservation work well when multi-node enabled
                 Key: YARN-9598
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9598
             Project: Hadoop YARN
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: capacityscheduler
            Reporter: Tao Yang
            Assignee: Tao Yang


This issue is to solve problems about reservation when multi-node enabled:
 # As discussed in YARN-9576, re-reservation proposal may be always generated 
on the same node and break the scheduling for this app and later apps. I think 
re-reservation in unnecessary and we can replace it with LOCALITY_SKIPPED to 
let scheduler have a chance to look up follow candidates for this app when 
multi-node enabled.
 # Scheduler iterates all nodes and try to allocate for reserved container in 
LeafQueue#allocateFromReservedContainer. Here there are two problems:
 ** The node of reserved container should be taken as candidates instead of all 
nodes when calling FiCaSchedulerApp#assignContainers, otherwise later scheduler 
may generate a reservation-fulfilled proposal on another node, which will 
always be rejected in FiCaScheduler#commonCheckContainerAllocation.
 ** Assignment returned by FiCaSchedulerApp#assignContainers could never be 
null even if it's just skipped, it will break the normal scheduling process for 
this leaf queue because of the if clause in LeafQueue#assignContainers: "if 
(null != assignment) \{ return assignment;}"
 # Nodes which have been reserved should be skipped when iterating candidates 
in RegularContainerAllocator#allocate, otherwise scheduler may generate 
allocation or reservation proposal on these node which will always be rejected 
in FiCaScheduler#commonCheckContainerAllocation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to