[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16919222#comment-16919222
 ] 

Abhishek Modi commented on YARN-5281:
-------------------------------------

We are already supporting Hbase and CosmosDB as backend. We also support 
local/hdfs filesystem with limited capabilities. Based on the discussion, I 
don't think it would be possible to support simpler backend with all 
functionalities without re-implementing some part of the features provided by 
Hbase/CosmosDB.

For single node setup, ATSv2 can still be used with limited functionalities 
using local filesystem as backend.

If no one is actively working on this, I would close this as part of Jira 
cleanup for ATSv2.

cc [~vrushalic]/[~rohithsharma]

> Explore supporting a simpler back-end implementation for ATS v2
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-5281
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5281
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>    Affects Versions: YARN-2928
>            Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: YARN-5355
>
> During the merge discussion [~kasha] raised the question whether we would 
> support simpler backend for users to try out, in addition to the HBase 
> implementation.
> The understanding is that this would not be meant to scale, but it could 
> simplify initial adoption and early usage.
> I'm filing this jira to gather the merits and challenges of such approach in 
> one place.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to