[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16962987#comment-16962987
 ] 

hcarrot edited comment on YARN-9927 at 10/30/19 12:39 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------

thank you [~epayne] [~adam.antal] for  comment and concern.

The code has been finished. I think this mechanism can handle RMNodeStatusEvent 
from different nodes concurrently. Because the lock object of different RMNode 
state machine is different.


was (Author: hcarrot):
The code has been finished. I think this mechanism can handle RMNodeStatusEvent 
from different nodes concurrently. Because the lock object of different RMNode 
state machine is different.

[~adam.antal] [~epayne]

> RM multi-thread event processing mechanism
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-9927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9927
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: yarn
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.9.2
>            Reporter: hcarrot
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: RM multi-thread event processing mechanism.pdf, 
> YARN-9927-addMultiEventDispatcher.patch
>
>
> Recently, we have observed serious event blocking in RM event dispatcher 
> queue. After analysis of RM event monitoring data and RM event processing 
> logic, we found that
> 1) environment: a cluster with thousands of nodes
> 2) RMNodeStatusEvent dominates 90% time consumption of RM event scheduler
> 3) Meanwhile, RM event processing is in a single-thread mode, and It results 
> in the low headroom of RM event scheduler, thus performance of RM.
> So we proposed a RM multi-thread event processing mechanism to improve RM 
> performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to