[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Peter Bacsko updated YARN-10018:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
There are some places in the container-executor native, where the {{fork()}} 
call is not handled properly. This operation can fail with -1, but sometimes 
the necessary if branch is missing to validate that it's been successful.

Also, at one location, the return value is defined as an {{int}}, not 
{{pid_t}}. It's better to handle this transparently and change it.

  was:
There are some places in the container-executor native, where the {{fork()}} 
call is not handled properly. This operation can fail with -1, but sometimes 
the necessary if branch is missing to validate the success.

Also, at one location, the return value is defined as an {{int}}, not 
{{pid_t}}. It's better to handle this transparently and change it.


> container-executor: possible -1 return value of fork() is not always checked
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-10018
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10018
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: nodemanager
>            Reporter: Peter Bacsko
>            Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>            Priority: Major
>
> There are some places in the container-executor native, where the {{fork()}} 
> call is not handled properly. This operation can fail with -1, but sometimes 
> the necessary if branch is missing to validate that it's been successful.
> Also, at one location, the return value is defined as an {{int}}, not 
> {{pid_t}}. It's better to handle this transparently and change it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to