[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17125949#comment-17125949 ]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9930: ------------------------------------ OK, no more UT failures, other than "TestFairSchedulerPreemption" which is very likely totally unrelated. Ping [~snemeth] / [~sunilg] / [~epayne] / [~maniraj...@gmail.com] for some feedback. If you guys agree with the approach outlined in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930?focusedCommentId=17118899&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17118899 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930?focusedCommentId=17124947&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17124947, then I'll continue the development on this course. > Support max running app logic for CapacityScheduler > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-9930 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacity scheduler, capacityscheduler > Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 3.1.1 > Reporter: zhoukang > Assignee: zhoukang > Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-9930-POC01.patch, YARN-9930-POC02.patch, > YARN-9930-POC03.patch, YARN-9930-POC04.patch, YARN-9930-POC05.patch > > > In FairScheduler, there has limitation for max running which will let > application pending. > But in CapacityScheduler there has no feature like max running app.Only got > max app,and jobs will be rejected directly on client. > This jira i want to implement this semantic for CapacityScheduler. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org