[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13821181#comment-13821181
 ] 

Steve Loughran commented on YARN-1404:
--------------------------------------

# I'd be inclined to treat this as a special case of YARN-1040, the "0 process 
state". If both can be addressed in the same code path, that's one less code 
path to look after.
# It's dangerously easy to leak containers here; I know llama keeps an eye on 
things, but I worry about other people's code -though admittedly, any 
long-lived command line app "yes" could do the same.

For the multi-process (and that includes processes=0), we really do need some 
kind of lease renewal option to stop containers being retained forever. It 
would become the job of the AM to do the renewal

> Add support for unmanaged containers
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1404
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1404
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: nodemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
>            Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
>         Attachments: YARN-1404.patch
>
>
> Currently a container allocation requires to start a container process with 
> the corresponding NodeManager's node.
> For applications that need to use the allocated resources out of band from 
> Yarn this means that a dummy container process must be started.
> Impala/Llama is an example of such application which is currently starting a 
> 'sleep 10y' (10 years) process as the container process. And the resource 
> capabilities are used out of by and the Impala process collocated in the 
> node. The Impala process ensures the processing associated to that resources 
> do not exceed the capabilities of the container. Also, if the container is 
> lost/preempted/killed, Impala stops using the corresponding resources.
> In addition, in the case of Llama, the current requirement of having a 
> container process, gets complicates when hard resource enforcement (memory 
> -ContainersMonitor- or cpu -via cgroups-) is enabled because Impala/Llama 
> request resources with CPU and memory independently of each other. Some 
> requests are CPU only and others are memory only. Unmanaged containers solve 
> this problem as there is no underlying process with zero CPU or zero memory.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to