[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jim Brennan updated YARN-9667:
------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 3.2.3

> Container-executor.c duplicates messages to stdout
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-9667
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9667
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: nodemanager, yarn
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: Adam Antal
>            Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.3
>
>         Attachments: YARN-9667-001.patch, YARN-9667-branch-3.2.001.patch
>
>
> When a container is killed by its AM we get a similar error message like this:
> {noformat}
> 2019-06-30 12:09:04,412 WARN 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.linux.privileged.PrivilegedOperationExecutor:
>  Shell execution returned exit code: 143. Privileged Execution Operation 
> Stderr:
> Stdout: main : command provided 1
> main : run as user is systest
> main : requested yarn user is systest
> Getting exit code file...
> Creating script paths...
> Writing pid file...
> Writing to tmp file 
> /yarn/nm/nmPrivate/application_1561921629886_0001/container_e84_1561921629886_0001_01_000019/container_e84_1561921629886_0001_01_000019.pid.tmp
> Writing to cgroup task files...
> Creating local dirs...
> Launching container...
> Getting exit code file...
> Creating script paths...
> {noformat}
> In container-executor.c the fork point is right after the "Creating script 
> paths..." part, though in the Stdout log we can clearly see it has been 
> written there twice. After consulting with [~pbacsko] it seems like there's a 
> missing flush in container-executor.c before the fork and that causes the 
> duplication.
> I suggest to add a flush there so that it won't be duplicated: it's a bit 
> misleading that the child process writes out "Getting exit code file" and 
> "Creating script paths" even though it is clearly not doing that.
> A more appealing solution could be to revisit the fprintf-fflush pairs in the 
> code and change them to a single call, so that the fflush calls would not be 
> forgotten accidentally. (It can cause problems in every place where it's 
> used).
> Note: this issue probably affects every occasion of fork(), not just the one 
> from {{launch_container_as_user}} in {{main.c}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to