[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13829264#comment-13829264
 ] 

gaurav gupta commented on YARN-1412:
------------------------------------

Yes All the nodes are on the same Rack.

Here is the experiment that I did to verify the theory
1. Cluster size: 36 nodes
2. yarn.scheduler.capacity.node-locality-delay is set to 36
3. Asked for 36 containers with priority 0
4. I requested containers with (node=yes, rack=yes,relax-locality=true)

But I still see that the containers are allocated on different nodes.


> Allocating Containers on a particular Node in Yarn
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1412
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1412
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: centos, Hadoop 2.2.0
>            Reporter: gaurav gupta
>
> Summary of the problem: 
>  If I pass the node on which I want container and set relax locality default 
> which is true, I don't get back the container on the node specified even if 
> the resources are available on the node. It doesn't matter if I set rack or 
> not.
> Here is the snippet of the code that I am using
> AMRMClient<ContainerRequest> amRmClient =  AMRMClient.createAMRMClient();;
>     String host = "h1";
>     Resource capability = Records.newRecord(Resource.class);
>     capability.setMemory(memory);
>     nodes = new String[] {host};
>     // in order to request a host, we also have to request the rack
>     racks = new String[] {"/default-rack"};
>      List<ContainerRequest> containerRequests = new 
> ArrayList<ContainerRequest>();
>     List<ContainerId> releasedContainers = new ArrayList<ContainerId>();
>     containerRequests.add(new ContainerRequest(capability, nodes, racks, 
> Priority.newInstance(priority)));
>     if (containerRequests.size() > 0) {
>       LOG.info("Asking RM for containers: " + containerRequests);
>       for (ContainerRequest cr : containerRequests) {
>         LOG.info("Requested container: {}", cr.toString());
>         amRmClient.addContainerRequest(cr);
>       }
>     }
>     for (ContainerId containerId : releasedContainers) {
>       LOG.info("Released container, id={}", containerId.getId());
>       amRmClient.releaseAssignedContainer(containerId);
>     }
>     return amRmClient.allocate(0);



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to