[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17290815#comment-17290815
 ] 

Qi Zhu edited comment on YARN-10639 at 2/25/21, 10:04 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------

Thanks [~shuzirra] for review, i also think  that painlessly add a weight field 
to the queue info will be a better choice, but:

It is hard to add weight field, the proto field will change to adapted to it 
too, also the other scheduler will have to change the QueueInfo related.

 


was (Author: zhuqi):
Thanks [~shuzirra] for review, i also think  that painlessly add a weight field 
to the queue info will be a better choice, i will deep into it. 

> Queueinfo related capacity, should ajusted to weight mode.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-10639
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10639
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Qi Zhu
>            Assignee: Qi Zhu
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-10639.001.patch, YARN-10639.002.patch
>
>
> {color:#172b4d}The class QueueInfo capacity field should consider the weight 
> mode.{color}
> {color:#172b4d}Now when client use getQueueInfo to get queue capacity in 
> weight mode, i always return 0, it is wrong.{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to