[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17304142#comment-17304142
]
Qi Zhu edited comment on YARN-10674 at 3/18/21, 1:26 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks [~gandras] for reply.
If we don't have PreemptionMode.ENABLED, we can use the has option to know if
this is enabled and passed to PreemptionMode enabled field.
{code:java}
public static PreemptionMode fromString(String cliOption,
boolean enabled) {
if (enabled) {
return PreemptionMode.ENABLED;
} else {
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(cliOption)) {
return PreemptionMode.NO_POLICY;
} else {
if (cliOption.trim().
equals(PreemptionMode.OBSERVE_ONLY.getCliOption())) {
return PreemptionMode.OBSERVE_ONLY;
} else if (cliOption.trim().
equals(PreemptionMode.NO_POLICY.getCliOption())) {
return PreemptionMode.NO_POLICY;
} else {
return null;
}
}
}
}
{code}
But fromString should return a value to make it used later, if it will return
null , it will confused with the case that we disabled but print not nopolicy
or observeonly. I think the flag will make this clear that we have four case
return value:
# null mean that we use illegal value
# PreemptionMode.ENABLED
# PreemptionMode.OBSERVE_ONLY
# PreemptionMode.NO_POLICY
What's your opinion about this?
was (Author: zhuqi):
Thanks [~gandras] for reply.
If we don't have PreemptionMode.ENABLED, we can use the has option to know if
this is enabled and passed to PreemptionMode enabled field.
{code:java}
public static PreemptionMode fromString(String cliOption,
boolean enabled) {
if (enabled) {
return PreemptionMode.ENABLED;
} else {
if (StringUtils.isEmpty(cliOption)) {
return PreemptionMode.NO_POLICY;
} else {
if (cliOption.trim().
equals(PreemptionMode.OBSERVE_ONLY.getCliOption())) {
return PreemptionMode.OBSERVE_ONLY;
} else if (cliOption.trim().
equals(PreemptionMode.NO_POLICY.getCliOption())) {
return PreemptionMode.NO_POLICY;
} else {
return null;
}
}
}
}
{code}
But fromString should return a value to make it used later, if it will return
null , it will confused with the case that we disabled but print not nopolicy
or observeonly. I think the flag will make this clear.
What's your opinion about this?
> fs2cs: should support auto created queue deletion.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-10674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10674
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Qi Zhu
> Assignee: Qi Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: fs2cs
> Attachments: YARN-10674.001.patch, YARN-10674.002.patch,
> YARN-10674.003.patch, YARN-10674.004.patch, YARN-10674.005.patch,
> YARN-10674.006.patch, YARN-10674.007.patch, YARN-10674.008.patch,
> YARN-10674.009.patch, YARN-10674.010.patch, YARN-10674.011.patch,
> YARN-10674.012.patch, YARN-10674.013.patch, YARN-10674.014.patch,
> YARN-10674.015.patch
>
>
> In FS the auto deletion check interval is 10s.
> {code:java}
> @Override
> public void onCheck() {
> queueMgr.removeEmptyDynamicQueues();
> queueMgr.removePendingIncompatibleQueues();
> }
> while (running) {
> try {
> synchronized (this) {
> reloadListener.onCheck();
> }
> ...
> Thread.sleep(reloadIntervalMs);
> }
> /** Time to wait between checks of the allocation file */
> public static final long ALLOC_RELOAD_INTERVAL_MS = 10 * 1000;{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
