[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andras Gyori updated YARN-10780:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
CapacitySchedulerConfiguration#getConfiguredNodeLabels scales poorly with 
respect to queue numbers (its O(n*m), where n is the number of queues and m is 
the number of properties set by each queue). During CS reinit, the node labels 
are often queried, however looking at the code:
{code:java}
for (Entry<String, String> stringStringEntry : this) {
      e = stringStringEntry;
      String key = e.getKey();

      if (key.startsWith(getQueuePrefix(queuePath) + ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS
          + DOT)) {
        // Find <label-name> in
        // <queue-path>.accessible-node-labels.<label-name>.property
        int labelStartIdx =
            key.indexOf(ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS)
                + ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS.length() + 1;
        int labelEndIndx = key.indexOf('.', labelStartIdx);
        String labelName = key.substring(labelStartIdx, labelEndIndx);
        configuredNodeLabels.add(labelName);
      }
    }
{code}
 This method iterates through ALL properties set in the configuration. For 
example in case of initialising 2500 queues, each having at least 2 properties:

2500 * 2500 * 5000 ~= over 300 million iteration + additional properties

There are some ways to resolve this issue while keeping backward compatibility:
 # Create a property like the original accessible-node-labels, which contains 
predefined labels. If it is set, then getConfiguredNodeLabels get the value of 
this property, otherwise it falls back to the old logic. I think 
accessible-node-labels are not used for this purpose (though I have a feeling 
that it should have been).
 # Collect node labels for all queues at the beginning of parseQueue and only 
iterate through the properties once. This will increase the space complexity in 
exchange of not requiring intervention from user's perspective. 

  was:
CapacitySchedulerConfiguration#getConfiguredNodeLabels scales poorly with 
respect to queue numbers (its O(n*m), where n is the number of queues and m is 
the number of properties set by each queue). During CS reinit, the node labels 
are often queried, however looking at the code:
{code:java}
for (Entry<String, String> stringStringEntry : this) {
      e = stringStringEntry;
      String key = e.getKey();

      if (key.startsWith(getQueuePrefix(queuePath) + ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS
          + DOT)) {
        // Find <label-name> in
        // <queue-path>.accessible-node-labels.<label-name>.property
        int labelStartIdx =
            key.indexOf(ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS)
                + ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS.length() + 1;
        int labelEndIndx = key.indexOf('.', labelStartIdx);
        String labelName = key.substring(labelStartIdx, labelEndIndx);
        configuredNodeLabels.add(labelName);
      }
    }
{code}
 This method iterates through ALL properties set in the configuration. For 
example in case of initialising 2500 queues, each having at least 2 properties:

2500 * 5000 ~= over 12 million iteration + additional properties

There are some ways to resolve this issue while keeping backward compatibility:
 # Create a property like the original accessible-node-labels, which contains 
predefined labels. If it is set, then getConfiguredNodeLabels get the value of 
this property, otherwise it falls back to the old logic. I think 
accessible-node-labels are not used for this purpose (though I have a feeling 
that it should have been).
 # Collect node labels for all queues at the beginning of parseQueue and only 
iterate through the properties once. This will increase the space complexity in 
exchange of not requiring intervention from user's perspective. 


> Optimise retrieval of configured node labels in CS queues
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-10780
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10780
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andras Gyori
>            Assignee: Andras Gyori
>            Priority: Major
>
> CapacitySchedulerConfiguration#getConfiguredNodeLabels scales poorly with 
> respect to queue numbers (its O(n*m), where n is the number of queues and m 
> is the number of properties set by each queue). During CS reinit, the node 
> labels are often queried, however looking at the code:
> {code:java}
> for (Entry<String, String> stringStringEntry : this) {
>       e = stringStringEntry;
>       String key = e.getKey();
>       if (key.startsWith(getQueuePrefix(queuePath) + ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS
>           + DOT)) {
>         // Find <label-name> in
>         // <queue-path>.accessible-node-labels.<label-name>.property
>         int labelStartIdx =
>             key.indexOf(ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS)
>                 + ACCESSIBLE_NODE_LABELS.length() + 1;
>         int labelEndIndx = key.indexOf('.', labelStartIdx);
>         String labelName = key.substring(labelStartIdx, labelEndIndx);
>         configuredNodeLabels.add(labelName);
>       }
>     }
> {code}
>  This method iterates through ALL properties set in the configuration. For 
> example in case of initialising 2500 queues, each having at least 2 
> properties:
> 2500 * 2500 * 5000 ~= over 300 million iteration + additional properties
> There are some ways to resolve this issue while keeping backward 
> compatibility:
>  # Create a property like the original accessible-node-labels, which contains 
> predefined labels. If it is set, then getConfiguredNodeLabels get the value 
> of this property, otherwise it falls back to the old logic. I think 
> accessible-node-labels are not used for this purpose (though I have a feeling 
> that it should have been).
>  # Collect node labels for all queues at the beginning of parseQueue and only 
> iterate through the properties once. This will increase the space complexity 
> in exchange of not requiring intervention from user's perspective. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to