[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli updated YARN-1481:
------------------------------------------

    Attachment: YARN-1481-20131209.txt

Thanks Karthik.

bq. HAServiceStatus returned by getServiceStatus() has an isReadyToBecomeActive 
method which is used by the FailoverController to check if an RM is in a state 
to become Active. This corresponds to Active and Standby states, as the RM can 
not be made Active when it is in the INITIALIZING or STOPPING states.
I see. Will become clear to me once I see the FOC code. Dropping the TODO now.

bq. .... Long story short, it can be removed.
Done, removed.

bq. I am not sure why we need a lock there in the first place. It should be 
safe to remove it here, as transitionToStandby itself is synchronized.
That was my question too. I just copied code and there was a lock on 
adminService there before. 

bq. Comments on the patch itself:
Took care of them. Overall, I put up a raw patch quickly to run it by you to be 
sure I am sure I not stepping toes.

> ResourceManager and AdminService interact in a convoluted manner after 
> YARN-1318
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1481
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>         Attachments: YARN-1481-20131207.txt, YARN-1481-20131209.txt
>
>
> This is something I found while reviewing YARN-1318, but didn't halt that 
> patch as many cycles went there already. Some top level issues
>  - Not easy to follow RM's service life cycle
>     -- RM adds only AdminService as its service directly.
>     -- Other services are added to RM when AdminService's init calls 
> RM.activeServices.init()
>  - Overall, AdminService shouldn't encompass all of RM's HA state management. 
> It was originally supposed to be the implementation of just the RPC server.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Reply via email to