[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640825#comment-17640825
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on YARN-6538:
--------------------------------------

brumi1024 opened a new pull request, #5174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5174

   <!--
     Thanks for sending a pull request!
       1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
       2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g., 
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   Extended the UTs and run the existing ones.
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   




> Inter Queue preemption is not happening when DRF is configured
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6538
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6538
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacity scheduler, scheduler preemption
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Sunil G
>            Assignee: Sunil G
>            Priority: Major
>
> Cluster capacity of <memory:3TB, vCores:168>. Here memory is more and vcores 
> are less. If applications have more demand, vcores might be exhausted. 
> Inter queue preemption ideally has to be kicked in once vcores is over 
> utilized. However preemption is not happening.
> Analysis:
> In {{AbstractPreemptableResourceCalculator.computeFixpointAllocation}}, 
> {code}
>     // assign all cluster resources until no more demand, or no resources are
>     // left
>     while (!orderedByNeed.isEmpty() && Resources.greaterThan(rc, totGuarant,
>         unassigned, Resources.none())) {
> {code}
>  will loop even when vcores are 0 (because memory is still +ve). Hence we are 
> having more vcores in idealAssigned which cause no-preemption cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to